XML 2001 logo

Where Do Topic Maps Come From?

Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net>

ABSTRACT

Topic maps have attracted considerable attention since they were standardised by ISO in January 2000. Many papers have been written, several books are in the works, training courses are readily available, and major applications are already seeing the light of day. Once they have understood the basic concepts, people start to see topic mapping as the answer to some of the very thorny information and knowledge management problems that confront them - and they begin to cast around for the tools they will need to exploit topic maps. There are already a number of free and commercial topic map tools to choose from, and vendors such as Empolis, Infoloom, Mondeca, and Ontopia have mature commercial offerings consisting, for the most part, of engines and browser applications. However, the current paucity of industrial strength editing tools for topic maps is seen by many as a stumbling block. "Topic maps are all very well", they say, "but we just can't afford to have expensive editorial staff creating topic maps manually."

The aim of this presentation is to show that these kind of fears are largely unfounded. It demonstrates that topic maps can and will come from many disparate sources and that by no means all of them will be created directly by hand. In fact, most topic maps will probably not even be maintained as topic maps, but rather as structured information in some other form, such as databases, metadata sets, and XML documents. The presentation will discuss the relationship between schemas and DTDs on the one hand, and topic map ontologies on the other, showing that much of the knowledge engineering performed for one purpose can be reused for others. It will also show that as a consequence of this, much of the data that resides in existing systems can be harnassed for the automatic generation of topic maps. Two novel approaches for doing this -- Virtual Topic Maps and the Metadata Processing Framework -- will be described and demonstrated.

Topic maps that have been generated automatically can be enriched by the manual addition of more manageable numbers of topics and associations. The presentation will describe some of the ways in which this can be done without having to confront editors with angle brackets, and also present requirements for a user friendly editorial interface to topic maps. Finally the presentation will show in practice how the power of topic map merging can be exploited to bring together topic maps from such disparate sources into a single, unified whole.

Table of Contents

1. Complete paper unavailable

This presenter's paper was not received in time to be included in the proceedings.

Biography

Steve Pepper
CEO
Ontopia
Oslo
Norway
Email: pepper@ontopia.net

Steve Pepper is the founder and Chief Executive Officer at Ontopia, a company dedicated to the development of high quality topic map software and the provision of consulting and training services. Steve represents Norway on JTC 1/SC 34, the ISO committee responsible for the development of SGML and related standards, and is convenor of WG 3 (Information association), whose responsibilities include HyTime and Topic Maps. He participated actively in the development of the topic map standard within ISO and is a founding member of TopicMaps.Org and editor of XTM (the XML Topic Map specification). He was recently appointed editor of a new ISO project to develop a Topic Map Constraint Language. A frequent speaker at SGML, XML, and Knowledge Management events around the world, he has recently spent much time modeling topic maps and is the author of one of the most well-known public domain topic maps ("Ontopus' Guide to Italian Opera"). He is the author of a number of topic map-related articles and co-author (with Charles Goldfarb and Chet Ensign) of the "SGML Buyer's Guide" (Prentice-Hall, 1998).